(************************************************************************)
(*         *   The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team       *)
(*  v      *         Copyright INRIA, CNRS and contributors             *)
(* <O___,, * (see version control and CREDITS file for authors & dates) *)
(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
(*    //   *    This file is distributed under the terms of the         *)
(*         *     GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1          *)
(*         *     (see LICENSE file for the text of the license)         *)
(************************************************************************)

(** Power Function *)

Require Import NZAxioms NZMulOrder.

(** Interface of a power function, then its specification on naturals *)

Module Type Pow (Import A : Typ).
 Parameters Inline pow : t -> t -> t.
End Pow.

Module Type PowNotation (A : Typ)(Import B : Pow A).
 Infix "^" := pow.
End PowNotation.

Module Type Pow' (A : Typ) := Pow A <+ PowNotation A.

Module Type NZPowSpec (Import A : NZOrdAxiomsSig')(Import B : Pow' A).
 Declare Instance pow_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) pow.
 Axiom pow_0_r : forall a, a^0 == 1.
 Axiom pow_succ_r : forall a b, 0<=b -> a^(succ b) == a * a^b.
 Axiom pow_neg_r : forall a b, b<0 -> a^b == 0.
End NZPowSpec.

(** The above [pow_neg_r] specification is useless (and trivially
   provable) for N. Having it here already allows deriving
   some slightly more general statements. *)

Module Type NZPow (A : NZOrdAxiomsSig) := Pow A <+ NZPowSpec A.
Module Type NZPow' (A : NZOrdAxiomsSig) := Pow' A <+ NZPowSpec A.

(** Derived properties of power *)

Module Type NZPowProp
 (Import A : NZOrdAxiomsSig')
 (Import B : NZPow' A)
 (Import C : NZMulOrderProp A).

Hint Rewrite pow_0_r pow_succ_r : nz.

(** Power and basic constants *)

Lemma pow_0_l : forall a, 0<a -> 0^a == 0.
Proof.
 intros a Ha.
 destruct (lt_exists_pred _ _ Ha) as (a' & EQ & Ha').
 rewrite EQ. now nzsimpl.
Qed.

Lemma pow_0_l' : forall a, a~=0 -> 0^a == 0.
Proof.
 intros a Ha.
 destruct (lt_trichotomy a 0) as [LT|[EQ|GT]]; try order.
 - now rewrite pow_neg_r.
 - now apply pow_0_l.
Qed.

Lemma pow_1_r : forall a, a^1 == a.
Proof.
 intros. now nzsimpl'.
Qed.

Lemma pow_1_l : forall a, 0<=a -> 1^a == 1.
Proof.
  apply le_ind; intros. - solve_proper.
  - now nzsimpl.
  - now nzsimpl.
Qed.

Hint Rewrite pow_1_r pow_1_l : nz.

Lemma pow_2_r : forall a, a^2 == a*a.
Proof.
 intros. rewrite two_succ. nzsimpl; order'.
Qed.

Hint Rewrite pow_2_r : nz.

(** Power and nullity *)

Lemma pow_eq_0 : forall a b, 0<=b -> a^b == 0 -> a == 0.
Proof.
 intros a b Hb. apply le_ind with (4:=Hb).
 - solve_proper.
 - rewrite pow_0_r. order'.
 - clear b Hb. intros b Hb IH.
   rewrite pow_succ_r by trivial.
   intros H. apply eq_mul_0 in H. destruct H; trivial.
   now apply IH.
Qed.

Lemma pow_nonzero : forall a b, a~=0 -> 0<=b -> a^b ~= 0.
Proof.
 intros a b Ha Hb. contradict Ha. now apply pow_eq_0 with b.
Qed.

Lemma pow_eq_0_iff : forall a b, a^b == 0 <-> b<0 \/ (0<b /\ a==0).
Proof.
 intros a b. split.
 - intros H.
   destruct (lt_trichotomy b 0) as [Hb|[Hb|Hb]].
   + now left.
   + rewrite Hb, pow_0_r in H; order'.
   + right. split; trivial. apply pow_eq_0 with b; order.
 - intros [Hb|[Hb Ha]]. + now rewrite pow_neg_r.
   + rewrite Ha. apply pow_0_l'. order.
Qed.

(** Power and addition, multiplication *)

Lemma pow_add_r : forall a b c, 0<=b -> 0<=c ->
  a^(b+c) == a^b * a^c.
Proof.
  intros a b c Hb. apply le_ind with (4:=Hb). - solve_proper.
  - now nzsimpl.
  - clear b Hb. intros b Hb IH Hc.
    nzsimpl; trivial.
    + rewrite IH; trivial. apply mul_assoc.
    + now apply add_nonneg_nonneg.
Qed.

Lemma pow_mul_l : forall a b c,
  (a*b)^c == a^c * b^c.
Proof.
 intros a b c.
 destruct (lt_ge_cases c 0) as [Hc|Hc].
 - rewrite !(pow_neg_r _ _ Hc). now nzsimpl.
 - apply le_ind with (4:=Hc). + solve_proper.
   + now nzsimpl.
   + clear c Hc. intros c Hc IH.
     nzsimpl; trivial.
     rewrite IH; trivial. apply mul_shuffle1.
Qed.

Lemma pow_mul_r : forall a b c, 0<=b -> 0<=c ->
  a^(b*c) == (a^b)^c.
Proof.
  intros a b c Hb. apply le_ind with (4:=Hb). - solve_proper.
  - intros. now nzsimpl.
  - clear b Hb. intros b Hb IH Hc.
    nzsimpl; trivial.
    rewrite pow_add_r, IH, pow_mul_l; trivial. + apply mul_comm.
    + now apply mul_nonneg_nonneg.
Qed.

(** Positivity *)

Lemma pow_nonneg : forall a b, 0<=a -> 0<=a^b.
Proof.
 intros a b Ha.
 destruct (lt_ge_cases b 0) as [Hb|Hb].
 - now rewrite !(pow_neg_r _ _ Hb).
 - apply le_ind with (4:=Hb). + solve_proper.
   + nzsimpl; order'.
   + clear b Hb. intros b Hb IH.
     nzsimpl; trivial. now apply mul_nonneg_nonneg.
Qed.

Lemma pow_pos_nonneg : forall a b, 0<a -> 0<=b -> 0<a^b.
Proof.
  intros a b Ha Hb. apply le_ind with (4:=Hb). - solve_proper.
  - nzsimpl; order'.
  - clear b Hb. intros b Hb IH.
    nzsimpl; trivial. now apply mul_pos_pos.
Qed.

(** Monotonicity *)

Lemma pow_lt_mono_l : forall a b c, 0<c -> 0<=a<b -> a^c < b^c.
Proof.
  intros a b c Hc. apply lt_ind with (4:=Hc). - solve_proper.
  - intros (Ha,H). nzsimpl; trivial; order.
  - clear c Hc. intros c Hc IH (Ha,H).
    nzsimpl; try order.
    apply mul_lt_mono_nonneg; trivial.
    + apply pow_nonneg; try order.
    + apply IH. now split.
Qed.

Lemma pow_le_mono_l : forall a b c, 0<=a<=b -> a^c <= b^c.
Proof.
 intros a b c (Ha,H).
 destruct (lt_trichotomy c 0) as [Hc|[Hc|Hc]].
 - rewrite !(pow_neg_r _ _ Hc); now nzsimpl.
 - rewrite Hc; now nzsimpl.
 - apply lt_eq_cases in H. destruct H as [H|H]; [|now rewrite <- H].
   apply lt_le_incl, pow_lt_mono_l; now try split.
Qed.

Lemma pow_gt_1 : forall a b, 1<a -> (0<b <-> 1<a^b).
Proof.
 intros a b Ha. split; intros Hb.
 - rewrite <- (pow_1_l b) by order.
   apply pow_lt_mono_l; try split; order'.
 - destruct (lt_trichotomy b 0) as [H|[H|H]]; trivial.
   + rewrite pow_neg_r in Hb; order'.
   + rewrite H, pow_0_r in Hb. order.
Qed.

Lemma pow_lt_mono_r : forall a b c, 1<a -> 0<=c -> b<c -> a^b < a^c.
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha Hc H.
 destruct (lt_ge_cases b 0) as [Hb|Hb].
 - rewrite pow_neg_r by trivial. apply pow_pos_nonneg; order'.
 - assert (H' : b<=c) by order.
   destruct (le_exists_sub _ _ H') as (d & EQ & Hd).
   rewrite EQ, pow_add_r; trivial. rewrite <- (mul_1_l (a^b)) at 1.
   apply mul_lt_mono_pos_r.
   + apply pow_pos_nonneg; order'.
   + apply pow_gt_1; trivial.
     apply lt_eq_cases in Hd; destruct Hd as [LT|EQ']; trivial.
     rewrite <- EQ' in *. rewrite add_0_l in EQ. order.
Qed.

(** NB: since 0^0 > 0^1, the following result isn't valid with a=0 *)

Lemma pow_le_mono_r : forall a b c, 0<a -> b<=c -> a^b <= a^c.
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha H.
 destruct (lt_ge_cases b 0) as [Hb|Hb].
 - rewrite (pow_neg_r _ _ Hb). apply pow_nonneg; order.
 - apply le_succ_l in Ha; rewrite <- one_succ in Ha.
   apply lt_eq_cases in Ha; destruct Ha as [Ha|Ha]; [|rewrite <- Ha].
   + apply lt_eq_cases in H; destruct H as [H|H]; [|now rewrite <- H].
     apply lt_le_incl, pow_lt_mono_r; order.
   + nzsimpl; order.
Qed.

Lemma pow_le_mono : forall a b c d, 0<a<=c -> b<=d ->
 a^b <= c^d.
Proof.
 intros a b c d ? ?. transitivity (a^d).
 - apply pow_le_mono_r; intuition order.
 - apply pow_le_mono_l; intuition order.
Qed.

Lemma pow_lt_mono : forall a b c d, 0<a<c -> 0<b<d ->
 a^b < c^d.
Proof.
 intros a b c d (Ha,Hac) (Hb,Hbd).
 apply le_succ_l in Ha; rewrite <- one_succ in Ha.
 apply lt_eq_cases in Ha; destruct Ha as [Ha|Ha]; [|rewrite <- Ha].
 - transitivity (a^d).
   + apply pow_lt_mono_r; intuition order.
   + apply pow_lt_mono_l; try split; order'.
 - nzsimpl; try order. apply pow_gt_1; order.
Qed.

(** Injectivity *)

Lemma pow_inj_l : forall a b c, 0<=a -> 0<=b -> 0<c ->
 a^c == b^c -> a == b.
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha Hb Hc EQ.
 destruct (lt_trichotomy a b) as [LT|[EQ'|GT]]; trivial.
 - assert (a^c < b^c) by (apply pow_lt_mono_l; try split; trivial).
   order.
 - assert (b^c < a^c) by (apply pow_lt_mono_l; try split; trivial).
   order.
Qed.

Lemma pow_inj_r : forall a b c, 1<a -> 0<=b -> 0<=c ->
 a^b == a^c -> b == c.
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha Hb Hc EQ.
 destruct (lt_trichotomy b c) as [LT|[EQ'|GT]]; trivial.
 - assert (a^b < a^c) by (apply pow_lt_mono_r; try split; trivial).
   order.
 - assert (a^c < a^b) by (apply pow_lt_mono_r; try split; trivial).
   order.
Qed.

(** Monotonicity results, both ways *)

Lemma pow_lt_mono_l_iff : forall a b c, 0<=a -> 0<=b -> 0<c ->
  (a<b <-> a^c < b^c).
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha Hb Hc.
 split; intro LT.
 - apply pow_lt_mono_l; try split; trivial.
 - destruct (le_gt_cases b a) as [LE|GT]; trivial.
   assert (b^c <= a^c) by (apply pow_le_mono_l; try split; order).
   order.
Qed.

Lemma pow_le_mono_l_iff : forall a b c, 0<=a -> 0<=b -> 0<c ->
  (a<=b <-> a^c <= b^c).
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha Hb Hc.
 split; intro LE.
 - apply pow_le_mono_l; try split; trivial.
 - destruct (le_gt_cases a b) as [LE'|GT]; trivial.
   assert (b^c < a^c) by (apply pow_lt_mono_l; try split; trivial).
   order.
Qed.

Lemma pow_lt_mono_r_iff : forall a b c, 1<a -> 0<=c ->
  (b<c <-> a^b < a^c).
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha Hc.
 split; intro LT.
 - now apply pow_lt_mono_r.
 - destruct (le_gt_cases c b) as [LE|GT]; trivial.
   assert (a^c <= a^b) by (apply pow_le_mono_r; order').
   order.
Qed.

Lemma pow_le_mono_r_iff : forall a b c, 1<a -> 0<=c ->
  (b<=c <-> a^b <= a^c).
Proof.
 intros a b c Ha Hc.
 split; intro LE.
 - apply pow_le_mono_r; order'.
 - destruct (le_gt_cases b c) as [LE'|GT]; trivial.
   assert (a^c < a^b) by (apply pow_lt_mono_r; order').
   order.
Qed.

(** For any a>1, the a^x function is above the identity function *)

Lemma pow_gt_lin_r : forall a b, 1<a -> 0<=b -> b < a^b.
Proof.
  intros a b Ha Hb. apply le_ind with (4:=Hb). - solve_proper.
  - nzsimpl. order'.
  - clear b Hb. intros b Hb IH. nzsimpl; trivial.
    rewrite <- !le_succ_l in *. rewrite <- two_succ in Ha.
    transitivity (2*(S b)).
    + nzsimpl'. rewrite <- 2 succ_le_mono.
      rewrite <- (add_0_l b) at 1. apply add_le_mono; order.
    + apply mul_le_mono_nonneg; trivial.
      * order'.
      * now apply lt_le_incl, lt_succ_r.
Qed.

(** Someday, we should say something about the full Newton formula.
    In the meantime, we can at least provide some inequalities about
    (a+b)^c.
*)

Lemma pow_add_lower : forall a b c, 0<=a -> 0<=b -> 0<c ->
  a^c + b^c <= (a+b)^c.
Proof.
  intros a b c Ha Hb Hc. apply lt_ind with (4:=Hc). - solve_proper.
  - nzsimpl; order.
  - clear c Hc. intros c Hc IH.
    assert (0<=c) by order'.
    nzsimpl; trivial.
    transitivity ((a+b)*(a^c + b^c)).
    + rewrite mul_add_distr_r, !mul_add_distr_l.
      apply add_le_mono.
      * rewrite <- add_0_r at 1. apply add_le_mono_l.
        apply mul_nonneg_nonneg; trivial.
        apply pow_nonneg; trivial.
      * rewrite <- add_0_l at 1. apply add_le_mono_r.
        apply mul_nonneg_nonneg; trivial.
        apply pow_nonneg; trivial.
    + apply mul_le_mono_nonneg_l; trivial.
      now apply add_nonneg_nonneg.
Qed.

(** This upper bound can also be seen as a convexity proof for x^c :
    image of (a+b)/2 is below the middle of the images of a and b
*)

Lemma pow_add_upper : forall a b c, 0<=a -> 0<=b -> 0<c ->
  (a+b)^c <= 2^(pred c) * (a^c + b^c).
Proof.
 assert (aux : forall a b c, 0<=a<=b -> 0<c ->
         (a + b) * (a ^ c + b ^ c) <= 2 * (a * a ^ c + b * b ^ c)).
 (* begin *)
 - intros a b c (Ha,H) Hc.
   rewrite !mul_add_distr_l, !mul_add_distr_r. nzsimpl'.
   rewrite <- !add_assoc. apply add_le_mono_l.
   rewrite !add_assoc. apply add_le_mono_r.
   destruct (le_exists_sub _ _ H) as (d & EQ & Hd).
   rewrite EQ.
   rewrite 2 mul_add_distr_r.
   rewrite !add_assoc. apply add_le_mono_r.
   rewrite add_comm. apply add_le_mono_l.
   apply mul_le_mono_nonneg_l; trivial.
   apply pow_le_mono_l; try split; order.
   (* end *)
 - intros a b c Ha Hb Hc. apply lt_ind with (4:=Hc). + solve_proper.
   + nzsimpl; order.
   + clear c Hc. intros c Hc IH.
     assert (0<=c) by order.
     nzsimpl; trivial.
     transitivity ((a+b)*(2^(pred c) * (a^c + b^c))).
     * apply mul_le_mono_nonneg_l; trivial.
       now apply add_nonneg_nonneg.
     * rewrite mul_assoc. rewrite (mul_comm (a+b)).
       assert (EQ : S (P c) == c) by (apply lt_succ_pred with 0; order').
       assert (LE : 0 <= P c) by (now rewrite succ_le_mono, EQ, le_succ_l).
       assert (EQ' : 2^c == 2^(P c) * 2) by (rewrite <- EQ at 1; nzsimpl'; order).
       rewrite EQ', <- !mul_assoc.
       apply mul_le_mono_nonneg_l.
       -- apply pow_nonneg; order'.
       -- destruct (le_gt_cases a b).
          ++ apply aux; try split; order'.
          ++ rewrite (add_comm a), (add_comm (a^c)), (add_comm (a*a^c)).
             apply aux; try split; order'.
Qed.

End NZPowProp.
